The degree of competition is on three levels. First, within the LCC market, Ryanair is the market leader in terms of passengers carried and profitability. The next two largest players are easyJet and Air Berlin. There are several other players in this market including Wizzair and Sky Europe (based in central Europe), BMIBaby and Thomsonfly (UK), Air One (Italy) and so on.
Minimum growth has been at easyJet, which still managed an annual average growth of almost 19% per annum, which is more than triple GDP growth.
It should be remembered that the low cost sector is part of the wider commercial aviation sector and, indeed, easyJet believes that its biggest competitor is in fact British Airways rather than Ryanair. However, the total share of European travel covered by LCCs has been growing. Whilst LCC activity more than doubled between 2003 and 2007, overall European growth in air passengers was 31% over the same period (see appendix).
For trips not involving the UK, Ryanair has further competition from other modes (having to use Eurotunnel is relatively complex and expensive compared to jumping into a car). Europe’s high speed railway network is being developed in Spain, Italy, France, Germany and the Benelux countries and, as these railways continue linking across borders, competition from railways will intensify (for example, airlines have given up flying between Brussels and Paris, thanks to rail competition).#p#分頁(yè)標(biāo)題#e#
Last, and by no means least, is competition from the private car. Car has two major advantages over Ryanair: there is no need to book and the cost of the trip does not increase with the number of passengers.
Ryanair has traditionally targeted markets which are different to other LCCs. An examination of the route networks of easyJet and Ryanair reveals that whilst easyJet has a major part of its network devoted to holiday traffic between the UK and the Mediterranean, Ryanair has been more focussed on other markets such as workers travelling abroad and the VFR (Visiting Friends and Relatives) market. For example, the extensive route network Ryanair now has between western and eastern Europe targets principally east Europeans working and living outside their home country.
Ryanair has a two part pricing strategy. First, it aims to offer the lowest fares of any of its competitors and, thanks to its lower cost base, it is able to achieve this objective. Moreover, Ryanair runs very frequent price promotions: it is currently offering 2 million seats for sale in October, with prices starting from £10 return (including fees and taxes).
However, this fare covers just the core flight and excludes handling fees of £4 per person per flight for credit/debit card payments, checking in a suitcase (£8 one way) and airport check-in (£4 per person per flight). Ryanair would also hope to gain income through optional ancillary revenue streams such as in flight food and drink or car rentals booked via its site through Hertz.
The importance of the ancillary revenue stream to Ryanair can be seen by comparing the annual reports of 2003 and 2008. In 2003, ancillary revenue accounted for 13% of Ryanair’s total revenue stream. Thanks to the new charges for baggage and airport check-in, the proportion had climbed to 18% five years later. With increases in baggage handling costs and booking fees having increased in 2008, the 2009 proportion should climb to over 20% of the total.
Section C: Historical Performance
Ryanair has historically had two sustainable competitive advantages: it ordered most of its new fleet at a time when aircraft prices were severely depressed and, according to IATA (International Air Transport Association), it enjoys an operating cost advantage through very high utilisation of its aircraft and the use of secondary airports which attract lower costs.
For example, Ryanair flies to several cities in Poland from the UK, but not Warsaw. Also, Ryanair uses Weeze airport (one hour away from Dusseldorf) rather than the closer but more expensive Dusseldorf airport.
However, Ryanair’s share price signals its reliance on the UK economy above all, with 70 of its 159 aircraft based in the UK (Ryanair does not provide a breakdown of passengers by route or country). Therefore, the combined market of UK citizens travelling abroad and foreigners visiting the UK either for work or leisure purposes is by far the company’s largest market. With the exception of foreign leisure travellers, these markets are influenced by the state of the UK economy.#p#分頁(yè)標(biāo)題#e#
A quick way to examine an airline’s health is to check the company’s load factor (the proportion of seats sold on its aircraft). In the twelve months to July 2008, Ryanair’s load factor stood at 81%. By contrast, in the 12 months to July 2005, the load factor was 84%. Therefore, demand for Ryanair’s flights is not keeping up with the increases in capacity provided, as signalled by the drops in GDP during 2008.
Although a three percentage point drop may seem like a marginal difference, it means that on every Ryanair flight, there were an average of 5.7 seats empty which would have been filled in 2005 (Ryanair’s aircraft have 189 seats). As the cost structure of Ryanair and other airlines includes a high proportion of fixed costs, the marginal revenue from these empty seats would have delivered a significant improvement to the company’s bottom line. With over 1,000 flights per day, say 350,000 per annum and assuming an average revenue per customer of €40, the loss incurred by Ryanair due to the lower load factor is 350,000 * 5.7 * €40 = €80 million.
The drop in load factor is not a phenomenon specific to Ryanair. According to the European Low Fares Association, which covers 12 LCCs but not Air Berlin, load factors has been gradually dropping from 83% in 2006 to 81% in the twelve months to June 2008.
Not only has the UK been hit harder by the credit squeeze than most other European countries (for example, mortgage approvals have dropped for 14 months in succession and are now at their lowest ever level) but the combination of the crunch and the deteriorating economic situation has affected consumers’ willingness to undertake expenditure. Consumer confidence, as measured by Nationwide Building Society’s index, has fallen every month since September 2007
However, although there are specific factors driving the reduction in Ryanair’s share price – in particular, the price it is paying for its fuel in 2008 remains unhedged – the main factor is the downturn of the economy, the strength of the € against the £ (the exchange rate has weakened from €1.50 to €1.26 or so within a year, which makes Euro countries more expensive for UK visitors), the credit crunch as well as the price of oil. So, we can see that easyJet and TUI Travel, the UK’s largest tour operator, have also suffered slides in their share prices (see appendix).
Conclusion
There are three generic factors which can effect a company’s share price:
external factors, over which the company has little or no control;
competitive factors within the industry; and
company-specific issues.
In this paper, I have given examples of all three factors in play, namely the oil price and the level of economic activity in the marketplace, overcapacity in the industry (as witnessed by declining load factors) and Ryanair management’s decision on fuel hedging.#p#分頁(yè)標(biāo)題#e#
Appendix
Share Price of Other Major Players In The UK Travel Industry
easyJet
TUI Travel (Thomson)
Air Passenger Volumes by Member State, 2003-2007
Source: Eurostat
References
“5-year low for air passenger growth “ Seen at http://news.opodo.co.uk/articles/2008-08-04/18715592-5-year-low.php [accessed on August 20th 2008]
“Air Berlin Company Profile”, seen at http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history/1-Al/Air-Berlin-GmbH-Co-Luftverkehrs-KG.html [accessed on August 20th 2008]
CAA Airport Statistics, seen at http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=80&pagetype=88&pageid=3&sglid=3 [accessed on August 20th 2008]
Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation, “Ryanair's bludgeon now favourite to beat competitors scalpels” http://www.traveldailynews.com/pages/show_page/26766
[accessed on August 21st, 2008]
ELFAA, Statistics, June 2008 http://www.elfaa.com/statistics.htm [accessed on August 21st, 2008]
Eurostat, “Households having access to the Internet, by type of connection - (as % of all households)”, see at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=0&language=en&pcode=tin00073 [accessed on August 20th 2008]
IATA, Economics Briefing no. 5, “Airline Cost Performance”, 2006, http://www.iata.org/NR/rdonlyres/09078492-F854-4B38-980D-2B0E0048F725/0/890200_Airline_Cost_PerformanceSummary_Report.pdf [accessed on August 20th 2008]
Mortishead C., “Low-cost airlines hit by recession and fuel price escalation”, April 2nd 2008, seen at http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/columnists/article3662046.ece [accessed on August 20th 2008]
Nationwide Building Society, “Nationwide Consumer Confidence Index”, August 2008, seen at “http://www.nationwide.co.uk/NR/rdonlyres/556107BB-D21F-4DAF-89CF-7AB878850BFE/0/JulyNCCI6August2008.pdf [accessed on August 22nd 2008]
Osborne H., “Mortgage approvals hit record low”, July 29 2008, seen at
http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2008/jul/29/mortgages.property [accessed on August 20th 2008]
Ryanair, “Annual Report 2008” seen at http://www.ryanair.com/site/about/invest/docs/2008/Annual%20report%202008%20web.pdf [accessed on August 21st 2008]
Ryanair, “Roadshow Presentation: Full Year Results -31 March 2008” seen at http://www.ryanair.com/site/about/invest/docs/present/quarter4_2008.pdf [accessed on August 20th 2008]