Case Study案例分析代寫-全球商業(yè)案例研究。本文是一篇由本站代寫服務(wù)提供的留學(xué)生Case Study案例分析作業(yè)范文,主要內(nèi)容是根據(jù)作業(yè)給出的案例進(jìn)行分析,并得出結(jié)論。本篇Case Study總結(jié)出A國的生活水平高于B國。一個(gè)國家的GDP與其人口呈正相關(guān),因此高人口很容易轉(zhuǎn)化為更高水平的國民生產(chǎn)總值。例如,A國有1.2億人口,而B國有8000萬公民。這意味著,A國的人均GDP也高于B國,超過1.952美元。值得一提的是,人均國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值是該國的全部國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值除以總?cè)丝凇K@示了該國單個(gè)公民的平均收入)。
同時(shí)本篇Case Study提出國家A的社會(huì)發(fā)展高于國家B的社會(huì)發(fā)展。例如,兩國的人口分布揭示了社會(huì)福利發(fā)展的差異。在這種情況下,A國擁有充足的社會(huì)資源,農(nóng)村人口與城市人口的比例分別為21%和79%。相比之下,B國在社會(huì)福利方面發(fā)展不足,農(nóng)村人口與城市人口的比例分別為45%和55%。同樣,兩國在教育方面也有著多樣化的發(fā)展,因此,與B國的90%相比,A國94%的成年人達(dá)到了基本識(shí)字水平。以下內(nèi)容就是這篇Case Study案例分析代寫范文的具體內(nèi)容,供參考。
Part A Drawing Conclusions
The living standards of country A are higher than those of country B. The GDP of a country is positively correlated with its population such that high population easily translates into higher levels of national product. For example, Country A has a population of 120 million people as compared to country B which has 80 million citizens. This means that the GDP per capita of country A is also above that of Country B with more than $1.952. It is important to recall that the GDP per capita is the entire GDP of the country divided by the total population. It shows the average amount of income earned by a single citizen in the country (Neal & Shone, 2016).
The social development of country A is higher than the social development of country B. for example, the demographic distribution of the two countries reveal disparities in the development of social amenities. In this case, country A is well endowed in terms of social resources as depicted by the ratio rural-urban population of 21 percent to 79 percent respectively. In contrast, Country B is poorly developed with regard to social amenities such that its ratio of rural to urban population stands at 45 % and 55 % respectively. Likewise, the two countries have diversified development in terms of education such that 94 percent of adults in country A have attained basic literacy levels as compared to country B which is recorded at 90 percent (Neal & Shone, 2016).
The economic development of country A is higher than that of country B. For example, the income inequalities between the two countries depict the gap between the rich and poor as well as the rate of resource allocation. It has been noted that from the 20 percent samples of the poorest and wealthiest people in Country A, only 4.19 percent and 54.6 percent are contributed respectively by the two groups. Additionally, the price levels in the countries are depicted by the inflation rates. For instance, the inflation rate of country A stands at 2.8 percent while Country B is recorded at 4.8 percent (Neal & Shone, 2016).
A國的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展高于B國。例如,兩國之間的收入不平等反映了貧富差距以及資源分配率。據(jù)指出,在A國最貧窮和最富有的人的20%樣本中,這兩個(gè)群體分別只貢獻(xiàn)了4.19%和54.6%。此外,這些國家的價(jià)格水平由通貨膨脹率來描述。例如,A國的通貨膨脹率為2.8%,而B國為4.8%。
Part B Timeline Graph
圖1
Source: EIU (2017).Malaysia and Philippines: Selected series 2012 to 2022[Datafile]. Retrieved from https://eiu-bvdep-com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/version-
Part C Foreign Direct Investment 外國直接投資
Foreign direct investment (FDI) refers to the allocation of funds by an investor in a business into another country, and substantial control is exercised over this entity. For an investor to control a firm, they should own more that 10 percent of the share capital. Organizations that have specialized in FDIs are referred to as multinational corporations (MNCs) or sometimes are known as multinational enterprises (MNEs). It is important to note that an MNC makes the decision of investment through Greenfield or Brownfield; whereby the former refers to investment in the new enterprise from start-up phase, while the latter refers to a foreign firm acquiring some stake in the local company (Gudmundsson, 2013).
本篇Case Study解釋了外國直接投資是指一家企業(yè)的投資者將資金分配到另一個(gè)國家,并對(duì)該實(shí)體行使實(shí)質(zhì)控制權(quán)。投資者要想控制一家公司,就應(yīng)該擁有超過10%的股本。專門從事外國直接投資的組織被稱為跨國公司,有時(shí)被稱為多國企業(yè)。需要注意的是,跨國公司通過Greenfield或Brownfield進(jìn)行投資決策;前者是指從初創(chuàng)階段對(duì)新企業(yè)的投資,而后者是指外國公司收購當(dāng)?shù)毓镜牟糠止煞荨?/p>
There are three basic types of FDIs that firms can engage in as penetration strategies in the foreign market so as to increase presence and market share.? FDI takes various forms in taking business operations across borders such as full ownership, joint venture and new establishments. The investor might make the decision of buying the whole percentage of shares of the existing company so as to gain full control in terms of ownership and management. On the other hand, joint ventures take the form of the investor collaborates with local investors to run the business, it is important to note that, this form of FDI is highly preferable to the others due to the fact that the local investors possess knowledge about and experience regarding the local market.? Likewise, the investor might make the conscious decision totally new subsidiaries in the foreign country so as to undertake production at cost advantages (Gudmundsson, 2013).
本篇Case Study指出有三種基本類型的外國直接投資可以作為企業(yè)在外國市場的滲透戰(zhàn)略,以增加存在和市場份額。外國直接投資采取各種形式進(jìn)行跨境商業(yè)運(yùn)營,如完全所有權(quán)、合資企業(yè)和新機(jī)構(gòu)。投資者可以決定購買現(xiàn)有公司的全部股份,以便在所有權(quán)和管理方面獲得完全控制權(quán)。另一方面,合資企業(yè)采取投資者與當(dāng)?shù)赝顿Y者合作經(jīng)營企業(yè)的形式,值得注意的是,這種形式的外國直接投資比其他形式的外國投資更可取,因?yàn)楫?dāng)?shù)赝顿Y者擁有有關(guān)當(dāng)?shù)厥袌龅闹R(shí)和經(jīng)驗(yàn),投資者可能會(huì)有意識(shí)地決定在外國設(shè)立全新的子公司,以便以成本優(yōu)勢進(jìn)行生產(chǎn)。
Acquisitions are popular among investors due to the numerous benefits that accrue to them such as speed, market power, negating entry barriers, and availing resources and competencies. The most fundamental advantage of investing in a Brownfield is the speed with which the investors acquire control of the entities through possession of assets and core competencies that had hitherto existed in the world of dreams. This management strategy allows the investors to gain direct access to new products and services and new forms of markets. Similarly, it is possible to overcome the negativities accompanied with risks and costs of production in case of developing a new product (Gudmundsson, 2013).
收購在投資者中很受歡迎,因?yàn)樗鼛砹嗽S多好處,如速度、市場力量、消除進(jìn)入壁壘以及利用資源和能力。投資Brownfield最根本的優(yōu)勢是投資者通過擁有迄今為止存在于夢(mèng)想世界中的資產(chǎn)和核心能力來獲得對(duì)實(shí)體的控制權(quán)的速度。這種管理策略使投資者能夠直接獲得新產(chǎn)品、新服務(wù)和新形式的市場。同樣,在開發(fā)新產(chǎn)品的情況下,可以克服伴隨著風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和生產(chǎn)成本的負(fù)面影響。
Acquisitions of local companies by foreign investors allow them to acquire market power that was yielded by the defunct entities. The presence and share of the acquisitions increase after the completion of the transactions. In this regard, the new entities are in a position to reduce the amount of competition which they are subjected to as well as engage in product diversification.? Acquisitions enable investors to overcome the bureaucratic requirements of entry to the industries. This is because the Brownfield already exists in the market before the conclusion of the transaction. In other words, the risks that would have been incurred in terms of competition are averted henceforth (Gudmundsson, 2013).
外國投資者對(duì)當(dāng)?shù)毓镜氖召徥顾麄兡軌颢@得已倒閉實(shí)體所產(chǎn)生的市場力量。收購的存在和份額在交易完成后增加。在這方面,新實(shí)體能夠減少他們所面臨的競爭,并參與產(chǎn)品多樣化。收購使投資者能夠克服進(jìn)入行業(yè)的官僚要求。這是因?yàn)锽rownfield在交易達(dá)成之前就已經(jīng)存在于市場中。換言之,本應(yīng)在競爭方面產(chǎn)生的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)從此得以避免。
On the other hand, the key disadvantages of acquisitions are many in terms of the negative effects they cause on the business. Firstly, there are problems to do with the integration of the philosophies, cultures, processes and structure of the old and new firms. Secondly, there are high costs incurred in terms of acquisition capital as well as restructuring and adoption of new technology. Thirdly, the financial consequences might be dire in terms of failure to recoup the costs incurred. The new firms may also undertake to invest in ventures that are not promising in terms of returns despite the insurmountable diversifications undertaken. Finally, the top managements might impede the internal development at the expense of local attention (Gudmundsson, 2013).
References List 參考文獻(xiàn)
EIU (2017).Malaysia and Philippines: Selected series 2012 to 2022[Datafile].
Gudmundsson, G. (2013). Multivariate Analysis of Economic Variables. Applied Statistics, 26(1), 48-53. doi:10.2307/2346867
Neal, F., & Shone, R. (2016). Relationships Between Economic Variables. Economic Model Building, 12(45), 27-53. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15673-3_2
另一方面,Case Study提出收購的主要缺點(diǎn)是對(duì)業(yè)務(wù)造成的負(fù)面影響。首先,新舊企業(yè)的哲學(xué)、文化、流程和結(jié)構(gòu)的整合存在問題。其次,在收購資本以及重組和采用新技術(shù)方面產(chǎn)生了高昂的成本。第三,如果不能收回所產(chǎn)生的成本,財(cái)務(wù)后果可能是可怕的。盡管進(jìn)行了難以克服的多樣化,但新公司也可能承諾投資于回報(bào)率不高的企業(yè)。最后,最高管理層可能會(huì)以犧牲當(dāng)?shù)仃P(guān)注為代價(jià)阻礙內(nèi)部發(fā)展。本站提供各國各專業(yè)留學(xué)生Case Study案例分析范文,Case Study代寫以及Case Study寫作輔導(dǎo),如有需要可咨詢本平臺(tái)一起學(xué)習(xí)并掌握Case Study案例分析怎么寫。
相關(guān)文章
UKthesis provides an online writing service for all types of academic writing. Check out some of them and don't hesitate to place your order.